Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Requirements

These are the requirements the design must keep. A change to the model that breaks one is a design change, not a tweak, and this page changes with it. The structural assertions and collision checks screen many of them; none of them replaces testing printed parts.

Load rating

  • The platform is rated for 49 kg (about 481 N). The Crimpdeq itself is rated to 1500 N (about 150 kg); the printed lugs set the lower limit.
  • The printed structure is sized with a 2.0 structural design factor, but the platform is never loaded above its 49 kg rating.

Printing

  • Every part is 3D-printed. There are no bolts, pins, inserts or other purchased hardware.
  • Every part prints without supports.
  • Each base half fits within the 240 mm printable length of a 256 mm bed (Bambu Lab A1). The halves join with vertical dovetails whose joint faces are in compression under load.

Case and load path

  • The platform holds the crimpdeq-case v2.0.0 enclosure and every earlier release.
  • The case lies flat, lid up, and floats at least 1 mm above the deck and clear of every printed part. Its shell, lid and screws never carry load.
  • Hand force passes through printed round lugs in the Ø15 mm ring bores of both load-cell eyes: the anchor block’s lug and the grip’s lug. Each stands on a tongue rising through the case’s eye U-slot, at least 1 mm from the case and its lid battery walls.
  • The lugs are solid. The anchor block and grip print upright, so the lug and tongue roots are screened across the layers.
  • Two snap-on eye clips hold the load cell down under the lug heads. Each fits by dropping into its U-slot and sliding onto the lug neck, with finger room beside the grip-side fin.
  • The clips carry the grip’s tilt but not the pull; the clip ring and lug neck are screened for that tilt.
  • The switch and USB port stay reachable from the open +Y side of the base.

Finger pocket and stoppers

  • The four-finger hangboard pocket is exactly 25 mm deep, with an opening at least 80 mm wide, a 6 mm back wall and an 8 mm loading lip. Its +Z opening stays clear.
  • The mid-depth of every edge is within 5 mm of the load-cell plane. The current model is at most 4 mm off, on the 10 mm edge.
  • Two stackable drop-in stoppers, 5 and 10 mm thick, give 20, 15 and 10 mm edges. The closed pocket walls locate them.
  • Their pull tabs run in slots in the pocket end walls and stand proud of the grip top, leaving the whole top of each stopper free for the fingers.
  • The stoppers are stored in a well in the deck beside the case.
  • Grip-guide ledges run under the grip’s side walls with a 0.8–1.2 mm Z gap and free X travel, so they catch tilt without carrying measured load.

Palm rest

  • The solid heel deck is level with the pocket mouth. The palm bolster rises 10–14 mm above it and at least 2 mm above the key heads.
  • The rest has seven positively locked positions, for hand openings of 25 to 85 mm.
  • The rest is captured on a dovetail rail and locked by two printed index keys in deck slots outside the palm area. Adjustment needs no tools.
  • Either index key alone is screened for the entire design force, and both travel extremes are checked after every geometry change.

Phone stand

  • A tilted phone slot runs across a two-cheek stand at the far (−X) end of the base. A narrow phone rests on both cheeks.
  • The slot floor is at Z = 15 mm, so the case hides the phone only from viewpoints less than 20° above the table.
  • The stand leaves finger room by the stopper well, is outside the load path, and is clear of the hand at every rest position.

Clearances

  • The base, anchor block, grip, clips, rest, keys, phone and case are collision-free except at explicitly modelled contact surfaces.

Structural screening

dynamometer_dimensions.scad fails with an assertion when a parameter change takes any of these checks past its limit. Values are at the 961 N design target: the 481 N rating times the 2.0 design factor.

CheckStressLimit
Eye bearing on each lug (14.3 mm × 4 mm)16.8 MPa20 MPa, lug bearing
Lug root bending across the layers, eye force at the load-cell mid-plane6.7 MPa12 MPa
Lug root shear across the layers5.98 MPa6 MPa
Tongue root at the deck, bending across the layers3.1 MPa12 MPa
Anchor block bearing on its pocket1.1 MPa12 MPa, bearing
Clip on the flat ring under the lug head, largest finger-pull tilt11.1 MPa12 MPa, bearing
Lug neck pulled by the clip, across the layers4.4 MPa12 MPa
Finger lip bending over the full 25 mm edge18.0 MPa30 MPa, bending
Grip side and back walls in tension1.2 MPa12 MPa
Either index key alone, in shear10.0 MPa12 MPa
Key bearing in the rest wing / base slot5.5 / 4.3 MPa12 MPa, bearing
Base slot ligament between positions, in shear9.3 MPa12 MPa
Palm bolster root, across the layers0.9 MPa12 MPa
Rail flanks holding the rest down at its shortest engagement3.6 MPa6 MPa

The clip check takes the 10 mm edge’s 4 mm offset, reacted between the clip and the tongue seat 10 mm from the eye centre. The base joint is in compression and is not screened; the stoppers, grip guides, stopper well and phone stand are outside the load path.

The printed-material limits (allowable_printed_* and allowable_lug_bearing_mpa) are assumptions that need coupon tests. The calculations leave out the 3D stress field, notches, one-finger loading, print defects, creep, fatigue and temperature, and they are not FEA or proof tests. The design factor is not a demonstrated safety factor and never permits loading the platform above 49 kg.